bridal makeup indian

images Branded Indian Bridal Makeup

arabian ridal makeup. ridal

eb3_nepa

08-14 03:33 PM

Called 6 different operators at the USCIS and got different answers (atleast they are consistently inconsistent!)

2 Said it is perfectly fine as long as the amount is correct
3 said they prefer seperate checks but if the amount is correct they will accept it
1 said they will reject the whole package.

On a lighter note i spoke to one really sweet lady when my call was escalated. All i wanted to ask was about the checks, but she (very enthusiastically) looked up my information and informed me that i was not in the system yet and actually apologised to me. Now i KNOW she looked it up coz she got my middle and company names right even without my telling her that. She even said she has received a few calls today and the guy b4 me was a lucky caller as he was in the system as of Aug 8.

---

wallpaper arabian ridal makeup. ridal

indian bridal eye makeupsouth

ivgclive

03-29 07:39 PM

Which airport in Bangalore you landed?

Lal Bagh Airport. :D :D :D

---

indian wedding dresses for

gc28262

07-16 06:44 PM

If you have an appointment letter and a relieving letter from your past employer, that should prove that you worked for that employer.

A detailed experience certificate as mentioned above could prove your experience in the specified skillset.

Here is another notarized affidavit format
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFFIDAVIT FROM CO-WORKER

I COLLEAGUE residing at COLLEAGUE''s ADDRESS being first duly sworn, depose and state that:

I was an employee of COMPANY NAME, COMPANY ADDRESS from Month-Day-Year to Month-Day-Year.

YOUR NAME was also an employee of company as a YOUR DESIGNATION around this time and I am aware of YOUR NAME�s responsibilities as we were colleagues.

His/Her duties during this period included YOUR SKILL SET HERE

If you need any more information please do not hesitate to contact me.


Colleagues� Name & Signature

Sworn to before me this on MM/DD/YYYY

(Notary Public's signature & seal)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

2011 indian bridal eye makeupsouth

Bridal Hair Makeup/ Indian

immi_seeker

07-13 08:19 PM

I agree with Eb2India, It appears to be a mistake or typo on the part of USCIS.
You should approcah them. Hopefully they will react the same way as his case and you will get extended EAD. Goodluck

thanks

---

more...

pakistani wedding makeup.

nyckings

10-15 12:44 PM

My wife attended for H4 stamping at Hyderabad consulate yesterday, 10/13/09. The consulate officer was asking for my current visa copy even though my wife gave my H1B extension approval copy with valid I-94.

Here is the immigration status so far:
1. Current H1 valid from Oct 09-Sep 11 with I-94
2. Earlier changed from L1 to H1 in April 2007. Then traveled to India using AP as I filed for 485 in Aug 07.
3. Had L1 visa stamping in Jan 2006.

So my old passport has L1 visa and new passport has AP stamp. Now I am thinking to answer the US Consulate Hyderabad explaining my current status - that I have a approved H1 petition but no visa stamping.

Please let me know your suggestions!!! Is there any chance that the visa can be rejected and revoked.

Now my last option is to apply for AP for my wife while she is in India.

Can I apply for AP when she is in India?


Thanks

---

Indian Bridal Makeup With

andy garcia

08-23 02:57 PM

How many visas are there for India in a year in EB3, EB2 and EB1?


YEAR **** EB1 ****** EB2 ****** EB3 **** Total(EB)



2000 *** 2,306 ***** 7,233 ***** 5,360 *** 15,381
2001 *** 3,543 **** 21,355 **** 16,405 *** 41,720
2002 *** 2,820 **** 21,310 **** 17,428 *** 41,919
2003 *** 1,266 ***** 8,536 ****10,680 *** 20,818 :confused:
2004 *** 2,998 **** 16,262 **** 19,962 *** 39,496
2005 *** 6,336 **** 16,687 **** 23,399 *** 47,160 :)


These figures are from this link
http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/statistics/statistics_1476.html

---

more...

In an Indian wedding most

gc007

01-07 10:38 PM

I wud just like to add that shud you travel and use your current visa your new I-94 will be stamped with date June 07. Then you have to extend you H-4 and your old approval will not be valid.

These are just my thoughts. And I am not a layer.

Have a great trip


Thank you very much .

---

2010 indian wedding dresses for

Branded Indian Bridal Makeup

mantagon

07-23 09:54 AM

AP is not a status, it is just a travel authorization. So, you may let it expire and then when you need it again, you apply for a new one, to be used for re-entry to the US.

Hope this helps!

Hi guys,

I bet this question must have been asked before but I couldn't find the relevant thread so I'm asking again. Apologies if its a repeat.

I am maintaining my H1-B while my AOS is pending. Last year my wife went to India while she had valid H4 (not stamped in passport) and AP documents. She did not get her visa stamped and reentered the country using the AP with no issues. He I-94 said Parolled till Some date, March 2009. I totally forgot about it and never renewed her AP or mine. Does it pose any kind of threat to her legal status in the US and AOS?

I am still working on H1 and she is a parolee.

Thanks in advance fopr the responses.

---

more...

ridal makeup gallery,ridal

n2b

07-17 03:41 PM

opening new threads like this is annoying, I see lots of useless thread around here which discourages me to come to IV that often. He is asking update from CORE like they owe him, he must have paid his attorney and should attorney in such way not here. Whenever core has something to share they do share, no doubts.

If you do not feel like coming to IV forum, that is your problem.

If anything only the IV Admins can speak of what the members can ask or cannot ask.

I think it is clear that this platform is not a paid subscription, so if the IV Admins do not ask for money who are you to speak of money here?

I did not demand anything, it was a request which the Admins and lot other members would understand except for some jacka** like u.

Is this your forum?

Also, those who have the "Senior" Member tags, imagine when you first joined this forum, if someone would have responded back saying "Have you paid any money that you are asking for it?" or "What have you contributed or given to this forum that you are asking for it?"

I think the choice and the decision on what to ask and what not to ask is on the Admins of this forum and the IV Members in general and not just on few people like you. If you dont have an answer please do not respond as you are adding to the so called "NEW ANNOYING THREADS".



opening new threads like this is annoying, I see lots of useless thread around here which discourages me to come to IV that often. He is asking update from CORE like they owe him, he must have paid his attorney and should attorney in such way not here. Whenever core has something to share they do share, no doubts.

---

hair Bridal Hair Makeup/ Indian

Bridal Makeup Indian. indian

tabletpc

11-29 11:35 PM

I had been procrastinating about Canada's immigration from almost a year.

yesterday i was kind of bored at work and decided to do something i had been postponing it form long time and motivated myself to apply for Canada's GC. it took me not more than 20 min to fill the application form.

2m i will send the application with fee..afterall what am i going to lose if tis getting precessed along with my US GC..???:)

Feel free to send me message if you need more information.

---

more...

Bridal Makeup Indian.

hiralal

08-14 06:36 AM

this is in response to some who say what if India does this and that ...the point is that India will do nothing. In general we have passive leaders and our PM is a great example of that - if it was done against china then immediately there would have retaliation. in some ways it is good if it stops the misuse ...I guess the biggest losers in this are the lawyers - more lawyer shops will close down

---

hot pakistani wedding makeup.

indian wedding makeup images

Canadian_Dream

04-15 02:25 PM

Please don't feed the troll.

---

more...

house Indian ancient wedding culture

Punjabi Bridal Makeup

eb3_nepa

04-13 08:41 PM

The following doc, 'How the senate bill becomes a law' does not mention any waiting period after President's sign the bill to become a law

http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/legprocessflowchart.pdf

My point exactly.

So then maybe the wait is only the 3 months (90 days) that Sen Sessions wishes to impose, correct?

---

tattoo Indian Bridal Makeup With

The makeup plays a crucial

puvathoor

02-17 09:02 AM

Even if Charles did say that EB2 India / China will have a cut off date of Dec 2003, how come the lawyers did not question him on this logic?

EB2 India was U from Feb 2008... The way I (and most people) interpreted that was that all visas for FY 2008 were used up... The possibility of new visas was only through spillover from other categories (or recapture of unused visas from other years).

What's happening here that after being moved to Jan 2000 before becoming U in Feb, suddenly things are moving all the way to 2003.

While I would love for this to happen, this seems to be a very remote possibility.

---

more...

pictures In an Indian wedding most

Asian Bridal Makeup

mallu

02-17 03:40 AM

There's nothing new in that website. EB-2 India for entire FY is GONE.. FINIS.. KHATAM... KHALLAS.
....
That forum posting by Attorney says " ...Charles Oppenheim spoke. Mr. Oppenheim is the officer within the Visa Office tasked with calculating visa bulletin cutoff dates each month. He offered the following thoughts as to cutoff date movement in the upcoming months:

In April, India and China EB2 will be set at 12/01/2003
...

So ?

---

dresses indian wedding makeup images

The Wedding Planner

chantu

06-15 10:45 AM

What if H1-B extension is for last 3 years of total 6 years? It means,my first 3 years are ending in nov 07, and if I file 485, will I get 3 years of extension or 1 yr extension?

---

more...

makeup ridal makeup gallery,ridal

Indian ancient wedding culture

dontcareaboutGC

03-19 11:24 AM

Ignore this if this is a repost!

U.S. House of Representatives
Committee on the Judiciary
Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security,
and International Law
Hearing on Comprehensive Immigration Reform: Government Perspectives
on Immigration Statistics

Testimony of Charles Oppenheim
Chief, Immigrant Control and Reporting Division
Visa Services Office
U.S. Department of State

June 6, 2007
2:00 p.m.
2141 Rayburn House Office Building

Chairman Lofgren, Ranking Member King, and distinguished members of
the Committee, it is a pleasure to be here this afternoon to answer
your questions and provide an overview of our immigrant visa control
and reporting program operated by the U.S. Department of State. The
Department of State is responsible for administering the provisions of
the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) related to the numerical
limitations on immigrant visa issuances. At the beginning of each
month, the Visa Office (VO) receives a report from each consular post
listing totals of documentarily-qualified immigrant visa applicants in
categories subject to numerical limitation. Cases are grouped in three
different categories: 1) foreign state chargeability, 2) preference,
and 3) priority date.

Foreign state chargeability for visa purposes refers to the fact that
an immigrant is chargeable to the numerical limitation for the foreign
state or dependent area in which the immigrant's place of birth is
located. Exceptions are provided for a child (unmarried and under 21
years of age) or spouse accompanying or following to join a principal
to prevent the separation of family members, as well as for an
applicant born in the United States or in a foreign state of which
neither parent was a native or resident. Alternate chargeability is
desirable when the visa cut-off date for the foreign state of a parent
or spouse is more advantageous than that of the applicant's foreign
state.

As established by the Immigration and Nationality Act, preference is
the visa category that can be assigned based on relationships to U.S.
citizens or legal permanent residents. Family-based immigration falls
under two basic categories: unlimited and limited. Preferences
established by law for the limited category are:

Family First Preference (F1): Unmarried sons and daughters of U.S.
citizens and their minor children, if any.

Family Second Preference (F2): Spouses, minor children, and unmarried
sons and daughters of lawful permanent residents.

Family Third Preference (F3): Married sons and daughters of U.S.
citizens and their spouses and minor children.

Family Fourth Preference (F4): Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens
and their spouses and minor children provided the U.S. citizen is at
least 21 years of age.

The Priority Date is normally the date on which the petition to accord
the applicant immigrant status was filed, generally with U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). VO subdivides the annual
preference and foreign state limitations specified by the INA into
monthly allotments. The totals of documentarily-qualified applicants
which have been reported to VO are compared each month with the
numbers available for the next regular allotment. The determination of
how many numbers are available requires consideration of several
variables, including: past number use; estimates of future number use
and return rates; and estimates of USCIS demand based on cut-off date
movements. Once this consideration is completed, the cutoff dates are
established and numbers are allocated to reported applicants in order
of their priority dates, the oldest dates first.

If there are sufficient numbers in a particular category to satisfy
all reported documentarily qualified demand, the category is
considered "Current." For example: If the monthly allocation target is
10,000, and we only have 5,000 applicants, the category can be
"Current.� Whenever the total of documentarily-qualified applicants in
a category exceeds the supply of numbers available for allotment for
the particular month, the category is considered to be
"oversubscribed" and a visa availability cut-off date is established.
The cut-off date is the priority date of the first
documentarily-qualified applicant who could not be accommodated for a
visa number. For example, if the monthly target is 10,000 and we have
25,000 applicants, then we would need to establish a cut-off date so
that only 10,000 numbers would be allocated. In this case, the cut-off
would be the priority date of the 10,001st applicant.

Only persons with a priority date earlier than a cut-off date are
entitled to allotment of a visa number. The cut-off dates are the 1st,
8th, 15th, and 22nd of a month, since VO groups demand for numbers
under these dates. (Priority dates of the first through seventh of a
month are grouped under the 1st, the eighth through the 14th under the
8th, etc.) VO attempts to establish the cut-off dates for the
following month on or about the 8th of each month. The dates are
immediately transmitted to consular posts abroad and USCIS, and also
published in the Visa Bulletin and online at the website
www.travel.state.gov. Visa allotments for use during that month are
transmitted to consular posts. USCIS requests visa allotments for
adjustment of status cases only when all other case processing has
been completed. I am submitting the latest Visa Bulletin for the
record or you can click on: Visa Bulletin for June 2007.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE SYSTEM AND CLARIFICATION OF SOME
FREQUENTLY MISUNDERSTOOD POINTS:

Applicants entitled to immigrant status become documentarily qualified
at their own initiative and convenience. By no means has every
applicant with a priority date earlier than a prevailing cut-off date
been processed for final visa action. On the contrary, visa allotments
are made only on the basis of the total applicants reported
�documentarily qualified� (or, theoretically ready for interview) each
month. Demand for visa numbers can fluctuate from one month to
another, with the inevitable impact on cut-off dates.

If an applicant is reported documentarily qualified but allocation of
a visa number is not possible because of a visa availability cut-off
date, the demand is recorded at VO and an allocation is made as soon
as the applicable cut-off date advances beyond the applicant's
priority date. There is no need for such applicant to be reported a
second time.

Visa numbers are always allotted for all documentarily-qualified
applicants with a priority date before the relevant cut-off date, as
long as the case had been reported to VO in time to be included in the
monthly calculation of visa availability. Failure of visa number
receipt by the overseas processing office could mean that the request
was not dispatched in time to reach VO for the monthly allocation
cycle, or that information on the request was incomplete or inaccurate
(e.g., incorrect priority date).

Allocations to Foreign Service posts outside the regular monthly cycle
are possible in emergency or exceptional cases, but only at the
request of the office processing the case. Note that, should
retrogression of a cut-off date be announced, VO can honor
extraordinary requests for additional numbers only if the applicant's
priority date is earlier than the retrogressed cut-off date. Not all
numbers allocated are actually used for visa issuance; some are
returned to VO and are reincorporated into the pool of numbers
available for later allocation during the fiscal year. The rate of
return of unused numbers may fluctuate from month to month, just as
demand may fluctuate. Lower returns mean fewer numbers available for
subsequent reallocation. Fluctuations can cause cut-off date movement
to slow, stop, or even retrogress. Retrogression is particularly
possible near the end of the fiscal year as visa issuance approaches
the annual limitations.

Per-country limit: The annual per-country limitation of 7 percent is a
cap, which visa issuances to any single country may not exceed.
Applicants compete for visas primarily on a worldwide basis. The
country limitation serves to avoid monopolization of virtually all the
annual limitation by applicants from only a few countries. This
limitation is not a quota to which any particular country is entitled,
however. A portion of the numbers provided to the Family Second
preference category is exempt from this per-country cap. The American
Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act (AC21) removed the
per-country limit in any calendar quarter in which overall applicant
demand for Employment-based visa numbers is less than the total of
such numbers available.

Applicability of Section 202(e): When visa demand by
documentarily-qualified applicants from a particular country exceeds
the amount of numbers available under the annual numerical limitation,
that country is considered to be oversubscribed. Oversubscription may
require the establishment of a cut-off date which is earlier than that
which applies to a particular visa category on a worldwide basis. The
prorating of numbers for an oversubscribed country follows the same
percentages specified for the division of the worldwide annual
limitation among the preferences. (Note that visa availability cut-off
dates for oversubscribed areas may not be later than worldwide cut-off
dates, if any, for the respective preferences.)

The committee submitted several questions that fell outside of VO�s
area of work, therefore, I have provided in my written testimony today
the answers only to those questions that the Department of State can
answer. Thank you for this opportunity.

---

girlfriend The makeup plays a crucial

desi ridal makeup. Indian

calboy78

01-12 01:04 PM

Why take chances ? Be safer than being sorry later.
Take some leave (paid or unpaid) - get it stamped over there + meet your loved ones. You'll have a peace of mind at the cost of couple thousand dollars.

"my" suggestion.

---

hairstyles Bridal Makeup Indian.

Anjali, Indian Weddings

dixie

09-19 12:38 PM

I dont see this as a particularly positive article... that is the reason it does not figure in the news section. This has been discussed before BTW .. way back in may just after it was published.
Thanks for posting, manderson.

The line "the group's efforts will be a test of the commonly expressed view that Americans are not opposed to immigration, only to illegal immigration" says it all.


IV should consider adopting this as a byline...

Also, pl.include this in the "IV in the News" section. I did not see it there..

---

immidude

07-13 10:36 AM

ppl respond i think it is very important

---

smuggymba

10-07 09:59 PM

Always keep a soft copy of the approval notices with you. I have paystubs on ADP so I can pull it online any time. At my previous comp, all my payslips where on the intranet.

USCIS's plan is to harrass, ours is to defend. We chose this by coming here. Chill out, don't worry too much.

---